Britain Officially Apologizes to Alan Turing

Friday, September 11th, 2009

For all who haven’t heard yet, the British government has officially apologized to the WWII code-breaker Alan Turing who was convicted of “gross indecency” (translated: “being gay”) in 1952 and chemically castrated. Turing committed suicide two years after. Turning was not the only gay man given the choice between prison or chemical castration under homophobic laws, but given his huge contributions to Britain’s WWII efforts, he is easily the most notable.

At least in part this apology and the press surrounding it has been because of the e-Petition that currently lists over 31,000 signatures.

Politics Closer To Home

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

This spring the province of Alberta finally got around to including gay rights into Alberta’s human rights law. Which is fine if really late to the party (like, 10 years late WHOA), but they also wrote into it a proviso that parents would be allowed to pull students from classes dealing with “controversial” topics such as evolution, sex, and — you guessed it — homosexuality. (Link here and here for some more commentary.) Where on the surface this appears merely eye-rolly, what this means practically is teachers will have to send out advance notice to all parents when they intend to cover those topics in class to allow parents the opportunity to pull their children, effectively quashing any “teachable moments” that might come up, bottling impromptu discussions about “religiously sensitive topics” that come up organically, and putting teachers’ (and students’) free speech under religious thumbs. All in the name of not ruffling a religious parent’s delicate sensibilities. So gay marriage is legal in Alberta and has been for some time, but Bill 44 would make such things illegal to talk about freely in a school setting without parental approval.

We may be a very conservative province, but there was a very loud UM WHUT that echoed across the internet, the LGBT communities, and the Teacher’s Association. Social media in particular was used to rally the troops and express dismay over the perversion of a bill that was supposed to secure gay rights. And, apparently someone was actually listening. Thank goodness.

Chris LaBossiere believes this is a direct response to the lobbying done by Albertans, including an active student-populated Facebook group boasting over 11,000 members and a Twitter debate with MLAs and the public that went into the wee hours of the morning and exposed the clumsy, fuzzy language of the bill.

It warms my heart that ordinary people can make a difference and maybe have made a difference here. Kids who still can’t vote spoke up, teachers spoke up, Albertans spoke up. It’s not a done deal at all and the bill still might pass as is, but at least we didn’t let it slide by without a fight. Even in Alberta this shit doesn’t fly.

The Complications of Slash as a Fanfiction Genre

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

This post calls some folk out who needed to be called out, and also draws attention to the blurry line of slash as a genre versus slash as the concept of same-sex relations. She also talks about the fetishization and over-sexualization of queer and gender-queer individuals — sometimes especially by slash writers — in real life. There’s nothing wrong with being turned on by slash, but there is something wrong with the entitlement that goes along with transferring and demanding that arousal be satisfied by real people. Would you like to be oogled and have sexual or intimate acts demanded of you for the satisfaction and sexual excitement of others? It’s objectification, it’s disrespectful, and it’s ignorant.

In some ways I think defining slash as a genre is a good thing; to me it means the fic has become so mainstream in fandom that it has created its own category with its own particular troupes and themes (some of them problematic, but that’s a whole other post). I also think it’s fair that, as slash identifies more as a genre, so therefore must het fic. Last year the admins at UR.org were called out for defining the Romance categories for the Hourglass Awards as "Romance" and "Slash Romance", and all of us *headdesked* in a simultaneous duh-moment; the categories are now defined more equally as "Het Romance" and "Slash Romance". Defining one as a deviation of the other as a norm is at the core of the privilege issues surrounding this debate. I think it’s more or less a good thing that slash becoming a genre has forced het to also become a genre.

But slash-as-a-genre does cause problems — especially in conversations about the topic — when some people discuss it (and whether or not they enjoy it) as a genre while some discuss it (and whether or not they enjoy it) as a broader concept. Most problematic is the discussion of slash that darts back and forth between the two definitions, using one to defend and justify what may really be homophobia and privilege. Value and moral judgments get clothed in false political-correctness, which somehow makes them "okay" to say.

Not enjoying slash-the-genre doesn’t make you a bad person. Saying so doesn’t necessarily make you a bad person. Just remember that any value/morality/decency modifier you choose to use when you do so can be rift with a subtext you may not even be aware of because individuals that identify with the lifestyles represented in slash and gender-queer fic are better equipped to see the privilege and homophobia beneath it than you are.

Some Thoughts On Amazonfail & Some Final Stats

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

Day One | Day Two | Day Three (Final Stats)

A recap for those following along at home:

• Between Sunday morning and Tuesday morning (approx. 48 hours)over 200,000 tweets were generated with the hashtag #amazonfail and, since the tag is still listed in the top trending topics, we can expect that number to keep rising throughout the day today.
• The online petition, which was at around 50 names Sunday at 11:30, is now at almost 23,000 names and still climbing, though the velocity on that has slowed some.
• The Amazon Rank Google bomb very quickly ascended to the top spot, second only to the news results about amazonfail.
• Searching Google News for the term "amazon" will garner a top result of almost 800 news items, all about amazonfail.
• Over 1,500 books have been tagged on Amazon with the tag amazonfail.

This may not be my final post on the topic, but with so many news articles and blog posts circulating, it’s essentially impossible to keep track of them all. I may post a final recap — mostly for my own benefit as someone looking to write up a comprehensive case-study on the topic for professional reasons — later in the week, but unless something new develops, this is probably my final comment.

Obviously the first half of this story — that GLTB, feminist, and disabled sexuality books, many of them not containing any erotic content, were flagged as "adult" and stripped of their sales rank, affecting their searchability on Amazon — is well-reported and what caused the internet to rise up and strike at Amazon. And while I share that outrage, many people have spoken about why this matters very eloquently elsewhere, so forgive me if I switch to more professional gears for a moment.

The second half of this story is that news of this broke in social media, primarily Twitter, and Amazon was already attempting to fix the problem long before mainstream media news outlets even got a hold of the story. Also puzzling is why Amazon’s PR department allowed this upsurge of bad PR to rise unchecked for so long, and why they are still continuing to allow bad opinion to circulate largely unchecked after their short and altogether unsatisfying statement about the issue without getting into the game. For a company that uses social data to great effect on their site and is considered one of the great Web 2.0 pioneers, their blasé attitude toward the negative up swell is at the very least shocking, and at the most dangerously ill-advised. I suppose we’ll have to wait to see how their pre-canned comment strategy works out for them as things die down (or perhaps don’t die down) over the next couple of days.

Was it a glitch? I think that’s mostly spin. (And so does most of the rest of the internet.) At the very least I think this was probably and badly thought out attempt to "protect the children" without fully understanding their own complicated and increasingly irregular tagging and category structure. As an e-commerce professional specializing in usability, I can say in my professional opinion that it’s a good thing most (if not all) people use Amazon’s search tools to find what they’re looking for, because their catalogue hierarchy is nightmarishly inconsistent, with different editions of the same book having different tags (some examples of which have been highlighted in this excellent post on Amazon’s meta data).

This also may go to show how middle-management of a large corporation can be a flimsy creature indeed, and how someone in the middle-to-upper echelon of a large company can perhaps push through changes without considering their full implications or spending the time to do a thing properly. Was it a knee-jerk response to a right-wing trolling effort, similar to the infamous Livejournal strikethru incident? Was it a hacker? Was it a policy shift that got executed too quickly and very badly? Was it a translation user-error made by a French employee? As long as Amazon continues to be tight-lipped on the topic, we can’t know for sure. Certainly anything that comes as an official statement from them will be painted up and spun round.

I tend to think it was another one of those unintentional things that reflects underlying social privilege and inclination to misunderstand and misrepresent those things that are different from so-called mainstream. Having said that, it was uplifting to see so many ordinary people rise up so quickly and say: no, this is not acceptable, and this is why. Rest assured that Amazon felt that slap, and hopefully other big corporations (and even governments) will think twice before implementing similar changes without a significant amount of research, thought, and openness.

Good job, internets. Sometimes you use you’re flaily powers for wank and eye-roll worthy silliness, but this time you have used your powers for good. Well done.

ETA: I’m going to link some "fallout" articles here, mostly for easy finding.

• Amazonfail: Where Are We Now?
• Amazon, Twitter, and the Gay Books Purge That Wasn’t
• Amazonfail: An Inside Look At What Happened
• New York Times: Amazon Says Error Removed Listings
• Some Thoughts On Amazonfail
  The Lessons of Amazonfail
• Press Questions I Just Answered
• More From Neil Gaiman (Scroll Down, About Midway)
• Amazon and the Cost of Freedom
• Copperbadge on Amazonfail
• The Fallout of #Amazonfail Continues (National Post)
• Why Amazon’s Explaination is None At All
• Rydra-wong on Amazonfail
• Amazon’s "Glitch" Myth Debunked

ETA: I’m going to link some "fallout" articles here, mostly for easy finding.

• Amazonfail: Where Are We Now?
• Amazon, Twitter, and the Gay Books Purge That Wasn’t
• Amazonfail: An Inside Look At What Happened
• New York Times: Amazon Says Error Removed Listings
• Some Thoughts On Amazonfail
  The Lessons of Amazonfail
• Press Questions I Just Answered
• More From Neil Gaiman (Scroll Down, About Midway)
• Amazon and the Cost of Freedom
• Copperbadge on Amazonfail
• The Fallout of #Amazonfail Continues (National Post)
• Why Amazon’s Explaination is None At All
• Rydra-wong on Amazonfail
• Amazon’s "Glitch" Myth Debunked

Amazonfail: Day Two

Monday, April 13th, 2009

Day One | Day Two | Day Three (Final Stats)

Amazon still insisting it was a glitch but hasn’t released any sort of detailed statement, just “we’re working on it”. Not exactly what the internets want to hear right now. The amazonfail hashtag search is just as hopping as it was last night. As of this post, wthashtag is showing almost 130,000 twitters tagged with amazonfail (over 30,000 already this morning), the petition goal post has been moved again and lists over 13,000 names, and more of the media has picked up the story including CBC, The Guardian, Entertainment Weekly, The Wall Street Journal, boingboing, The New York Times, The Advocate, and The Huffington Post.

Gawker wants you to know why they don’t buy the glitch line, and neither does most of the internet. Queerty is not impressed by excuses. Change.org has started a petition-like letter-writing campaign over on their site as well.

For people who don’t get why the internet exploded. After Ellen has a even better article about why this matters, the over-sexing of GLTB people, and what the larger problem is that everyone should read.

There’s a good round-up by right here on Livejournal. Also one from . And has an excellent, well-written summary. Some thoughtful thoughts from . And another summary from .

Dear Author looked at the metadata of each book and discovered the probable data links are exactly what the internet thought:

I looked up over 40 books that had been deranked and filtered out of search engines.  It appears that all the content that was filtered out had either “gay”,  ”lesbian”,  ”transgender”, “erotic”  or “sex” metadata categories.  Playboy Centerfold books were categorized as “nude” and “erotic photography”, both categories that apparently weren’t included in the filter.  According to one source, the category metadata is filled in part by the publisher and in part by Amazon.

Top Google news result for search term “amazon” gives you amazonfail topics by major news outlets. Unsurprisingly, searching for “amazonfail” gets even more hits, though last night both search terms only elicited a handful of top results on the issue. The Amazon Rank Googlebomb is now the top search result for term other than the news about amazonfail. A blog search shows over 6,000 results for the term amazonfail.

Over 1,000 affected books have been tagged on Amazon with amazonfail (at least it will be easy for Amazon to find the affected books).

The merchandise has landed. So has the lolcat.

Social media experts are starting to take note and document the amazonfail case study.

And if you think this is a quick fix and are wondering why everything’s still de-ranked, explains why it isn’t.

ETA: Salon article. And, from their excellent followup article:

At the very least, the “glitch” line suggests that this wasn’t supposed to happen, and Amazon recognizes it’s a highly undesirable situation for the company. Whether that means, “We had no intention of discriminating against anyone” or “We had no intention of so many people figuring this out at once and dragging our brand name through the mud” is an open question.

Also, ITWorld wants to know, and rightly so:

Getting back to my point, it’s dumbfounding that Amazon would let this controversy grow unchecked for a whole weekend. For such a giant in the online space, they certainly seem to be behaving like a brick and mortar company from two decades ago. The fact that this past weekend was a holiday for many people doesn’t stop the flow of information on the internet. Someone at Amazon HQ is going to have a very bad Monday, and deservedly so.

ETA2: Affected author Heather Corinna blogs about amazonfail on her Amazon blog. Meanwhile, wonders about the pre-canned nature of customer service responses that may be complicating the way Amazon responds.

ETA3: This guy says he’s responsible. After some clever detective work, people think not so much and call troll.

ETA4: Apparently people will try to make money off of anything.

And Reunifygally wants to remind us it’s not just GLTB books that are affected, but also books about sexuality and disabilities. I recently saw a performance of the Vagina Monologues that added a section on the disabled and how they are “protected” by their guardians and caretakers from their sexuality. It profoundly disturbed me.

ETA5: Neil Gaiman posts on his blog about amazonfail.

ETA6: Getting reports that amazonfail is breaking on Channel 4 TV news. I don’t have TV, but it’s all over twitter. (ETA: Report has been posted online here. Fast-forward to the 8 minute mark to see the amazonfail report.) It’s also starting to gain momentum on digg. There is an amazonfail tag on social bookmarking site delicious. And from Amazon’s own twitter feed? Business as usual.

ETA7: Affected author Jessica Valenti calls her editor who contacts her Amazon rep, who notes that this is no glitch.

ETA8: GLTB books seem to be re-appearing in the bestseller listings as of around 1:15pm MST today. And more conversation about the PR disaster side of the story.

ETA9: Reports of an anonymous Amazon coder insisting it was a “real person” who mass-changed the tags of over 58,000 books, though anon. qualifies that they can’t verify if it was intentional or accidental. Other reports indicate it may have been some sort of wacky translation error or an employee user error.

ETA10: Amazon spokesperson Drew Herdener admits error that affected over 57,000 titles in several categories:

This is an embarrassing and ham-fisted cataloging error for a company that prides itself on offering complete selection.

It has been misreported that the issue was limited to Gay & Lesbian themed titles – in fact, it impacted 57,310 books in a number of broad categories such as Health, Mind & Body, Reproductive & Sexual Medicine, and Erotica. This problem impacted books not just in the United States but globally. It affected not just sales rank but also had the effect of removing the books from Amazon’s main product search.

Many books have now been fixed and we’re in the process of fixing the remainder as quickly as possible, and we intend to implement new measures to make this kind of accident less likely to occur in the future.

Also, someone screencapped this on the Twitter homepage. LOL. And new definition for Amazon Rank has made it into the Urban Dictionary.

More thoughts from The LA Times here. Amazon Spokesperson Drew Herdener’s quote has also been picked up by The Seattle Times and The LA Times.

ETA11: Richard Eoin Nash on the social contract Amazon violated during amazonfail.